Abstract
The International Society for the History of Pharmacy (ISHP) is a distinguished organization representing twenty‐eight national societies worldwide. Its primary aim is to foster scholarly discourse, preserve the extensive heritage of pharmacy, and encourage its study internationally. As the ISHP’s centenary approaches in 2026, this commentary briefly overviews the society’s historical development, various activities, and publications. It also discusses the challenges and opportunities faced by the society and the field of pharmacy history. The objective is to shed light on how the ISHP can significantly contribute to understanding and appreciation of pharmacy history in an ever‐changing global context. This document celebrates the ISHP’s enduring legacy and evaluates its ability to adapt and grow in the coming years. It highlights the indispensable role of pharmacy history as an intrinsic and dynamic part of both pharmacy education and professional practice.
The Gesellschaft für Geschichte der Pharmazie (Society for the History of Pharmacy) was founded on August 18, 1926, after a pivotal meeting in Innsbruck, Austria. This initiative was spearheaded by Ludwig Winkler (1873–1935) of Austria, joined by George Urdang (1882–1960), Walther Zimmermann (1890–1945), and Fritz Ferchl (1892–1953) from Germany and Otto Raubenheimer (1867–1946) from the United States. The society grew rapidly, attracting members from seventeen countries, which led to adopting an international focus at the general meeting in May 1929.1
The society experienced significant changes from the interruptions caused by World War II. It was reorganized and rebranded as the International Society for the History of Pharmacy in 1949.2 After decades of regular activities and enthralling international events, the 1990s were a defining period for the ISHP, marked by a comprehensive review of the society’s statutes. This review process culminated in September 2001 with new statutes, establishing the ISHP as a nonprofit organization. Membership has become open to individuals interested in the study of pharmacy history, contingent on their adherence to the society’s statutes and support of its objectives.
According to these statutes, the ISHP primarily comprises national societies focused on pharmacy history. Membership in these national societies automatically confers membership in the ISHP. In collaboration with schools of pharmacy, pharmaceutical organizations, and key decision makers in the field, the society endeavors to preserve the legacy of pharmacy, ensuring that historical insights continue to enlighten and motivate future generations.
As of the end of 2023, the ISHP includes twenty‐eight national societies from twenty‐seven countries, with more than twenty societies located in Europe. The ISHP functions in three official languages: English, French, and German. More information about the ISHP is accessible on its website at https://histpharm.org/.
ISHP Activities and Publications
The ISHP organizes various events, including conferences, exhibitions, and anniversary celebrations, to facilitate scholarly communication and cooperation. Hosted by the ISHP in collaboration with its national societies, these events also include the biannual international congresses, significant gatherings where scholars discuss various historical topics, promoting academic exchange and international collaboration. The upcoming 46th International Congress for the History of Pharmacy is scheduled for September 4–7, 2024, in Belgrade, Serbia, with the theme “Pharmaceutical Profession and Society: Roots, Development, and Lessons for the Future.” Further details are available at https://ishp24.com/en/home-english/.
In addition, the ISHP has initiated historical presymposia in partnership with the History of Pharmacy Networking Group of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences (EUFEPS). These presymposia focus on historical and contemporary aspects of pharmacy across various countries. This initiative, which began in Frankfurt in 2019 under the leadership of Axel Helmstaedter, has gained considerable recognition. Notably, it has been acknowledged at recent EUFEPS congresses in Sweden and the Netherlands.
The ISHP has published an annual newsletter since 2000, providing updates on member societies’ activities and featuring news, obituaries, national reports, and event calendars related to pharmacy history. The entire volumes of this newsletter are accessible at https://histpharm.org/newsletter-archive/.
In academic publishing, the ISHP supports Pharmaceutical Historian, an international peer‐reviewed journal focused solely on pharmacy history. Published on behalf of the ISHP by the British Society for the History of Pharmacy, it is indexed in Embase, PubPharm, and Google Scholar. The journal covers global historical aspects of pharmacy and is accessible on Ingenta Connect. Thanks to the efforts of the Technical University of Braunschweig Library, Germany, past issues are accessible at http://www.bshp.org/publications/default.asp.
The ISHP offers a unique resource for researchers: a collection of retro‐digitized pharmacy journals spanning from the late 18th to the mid‐20th century. This collection encompasses sixty‐one different journals from various regions, providing insights into the historical development of pharmacy across diverse cultural and national contexts. The complete list is available at https://histpharm.org/retrodigitized-pharmacy-journals/.
Finally, the ISHP offers a research grant of up to €2,500 for projects with an international focus on pharmacy history. Recipients are encouraged to present their research at the ISHP General Assembly or the International Congress for the History of Pharmacy, enhancing community engagement and visibility of their work.
Current Challenges and Opportunities in Pharmacy History
The ISHP stands at a critical juncture, with its future intricately linked to the discipline of pharmacy history. Similar to related academic disciplines, this field confronts various challenges across methodological, thematic, and institutional dimensions. Addressing these challenges is essential for rejuvenating interest in pharmacy history and ensuring its comprehensive integration into scholarly research and pharmacy education. A concerted effort to confront these issues and broader discipline‐related challenges is crucial for advancing the study of pharmacy history and enhancing its relevance and accessibility in modern academic and educational landscapes.
Educational Challenges
A lack of specialized PhD programs contributes to the underrepresentation of educators and researchers in pharmacy history, hindering the growth and dissemination of knowledge in this field. Such a shortage leads to a scarcity of qualified professionals, negatively affecting the field’s prominence and sustainability. Tackling this issue requires advocacy for more specialized academic programs and resources, fostering a new generation of pharmacy history experts. A recent example is the pharmacy history PhD program initiated by the French Society for the History of Pharmacy, which bolsters academic discourse and career opportunities, thereby encouraging advanced studies and research in this field.
Curriculum Integration
Another significant challenge is integrating pharmacy history into the increasingly complex and specialized pharmacy curriculum. Often treated as an optional subject in many countries, many pharmacy schools worldwide do not offer pharmacy history courses.3 With pharmacy education shifting toward an integrated, problem‐based, and patient‐centered model, historical perspectives are often marginalized, reducing the field’s visibility and importance in academic settings. This challenge necessitates proactive advocacy and innovative curriculum development to underscore the relevance of historical knowledge in contemporary pharmacy practices and decision making. By embedding pharmacy history into the curriculum, students gain a holistic understanding of the field, appreciating the pharmacy profession’s evolution and the context of its current practices.
Engagement and Outreach
In an era where information is readily available, pharmacy history faces challenges in effectively engaging the public and professionals. Pharmacy historians must use innovative methods to captivate a broader audience, making the subject matter relevant and engaging. These methods include digital platforms and social media for outreach and education and incorporating diverse historical perspectives. In addition, countering the declining interest in pharmacy history among younger generations, often attributed to rapid technological advancements and perceived “irrelevance” to modern pharmacy practice, is crucial for reinvigorating interest in the field’s rich history.
Interdisciplinary Collaboration
The history of pharmacy is intricately linked with cultural, social, and political developments, surpassing the boundaries of scientific advancements. Despite the current scarcity of interdisciplinary research in this area, it is crucial to encourage collaboration with experts from these varied fields. Collaborative efforts are necessary to fully comprehend and articulate the complex nature of pharmacy history. Engaging in interdisciplinary dialogue is particularly important in tackling complex issues, such as the social determinants of health, public health policies, and the effects of global health crises, as exemplified by the COVID‐19 pandemic. Adopting this approach enhances academic discussions and guides contemporary practices and policy making in the realms of pharmacy and healthcare.
Funding and Institutional Support
Pharmacy history research often needs more funding, affecting the scope and depth of research. This financial constraint leads to fewer job vacancies, limiting opportunities for new researchers and academics. Inconsistent institutional support affects resource availability, requiring a balance between research, preservation, archival work, and public engagement. In an environment where historical studies are often undervalued, securing stable funding is a continuous challenge. Robust advocacy and strategic partnerships are needed to improve funding opportunities and job prospects, ensuring pharmacy history’s ongoing growth and development.
While addressing these challenges, the future of pharmacy history also offers numerous promising opportunities. If effectively harnessed, these opportunities have the potential to substantially contribute to the growth and relevance of the field. ISHP and its affiliated national societies are well positioned to take a leading role in seizing these prospects.
Technological Advancements
Modern technology offers significant benefits to pharmacy history. It enables the digitization of historical materials, ensuring their preservation and accessibility for future research. Artificial intelligence technologies facilitate efficient searches through extensive historical archives. The challenge of digitizing and preserving historical records and artifacts amid rapid technological changes is considerable. Transitioning from physical to digital archives demands significant resources and expertise. Ensuring the long‐term sustainability and accessibility of these digital formats, however, is a critical ongoing concern. ISHP and its member societies can play a crucial role in advocating for and supporting the integration of these technologies, thereby bolstering research capabilities in pharmacy history.
Medical Humanities Integration
There is a growing trend to contextualize pharmacy history in the broader scope of medical humanities. This interdisciplinary approach, encompassing perspectives such as racial and gender equity, enriches the field. Recent studies have explored the integration of pharmacy history into the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education Standards, including such areas as cultural sensitivity, entrepreneurship, innovation, patient advocacy, and leadership. Incorporating pharmacy history courses based on these findings might better prepare future pharmacists and enhance their skills in critical thinking, cultural competency, and leadership, while enabling them to more positively adapt to changes.4 ISHP and its member societies can encourage and facilitate such integrations, emphasizing the importance of a comprehensive understanding of pharmacy history. This approach requires scholars to have proficiency in multiple areas, a demand the societies can address through educational and training initiatives.
Traditional Medical Practices
As an increasing number of research studies focus on applying traditional medical practices to maintain health and prevent, improve, or treat illnesses, the history of pharmacy gains special significance. Medico‐pharmaceutical manuscripts and herbals are invaluable for tracing the history of traditional pharmacy and reviving long‐forgotten medical lore. These resources are crucial for bio‐prospecting medicinal plants and discovering novel pharmaceutical agents, using various data‐mining techniques. ISHP and its member societies can play a pivotal role in advocating for and supporting research in this area, thereby illuminating the historical roots and evolution of traditional medical practices.
International Collaborations
ISHP, with its vast international network, is well positioned to orchestrate multicenter studies involving substantial sample sizes and comparative analyses across various countries. With this network, member societies can collect extensive data, providing critical insights into the efficacy of pharmacy history education in various cultural and educational settings. This strategy does more than deepen our understanding of the reception of these courses; it actively informs curriculum enhancements and innovations. Such efforts are vital to ensure that pharmacy history teaching remains relevant and influential in contemporary pharmaceutical education, adapting to the evolving needs of students and educators globally.
Diverse and Inclusive Representation
The ISHP primarily consists of members from European countries, in addition to Canada, the United States, Colombia, the United Kingdom, Hong Kong, and Japan. There is a noticeable gap in its geographical representation. To acquire a more comprehensive global perspective, the ISHP would benefit significantly from expanding its membership to include countries from South America, Africa, the Balkans, the Arabian Peninsula, the Caucasus, Central Asia, and Australia over the next decade. Such diversification would enhance the society’s professional network and facilitate a deeper exploration of historical references across a wider range of languages and periods. Broadening its member base would allow the ISHP to access more diverse pharmaceutical histories and cultural contexts, contributing to a more comprehensive and inclusive understanding of the field. This expansion is crucial for the member societies to reflect pharmacy history’s global nature and foster international collaboration and scholarship.
Future Directions
The ISHP, along with its member societies, has consistently been a source of inspiration for future projects. This is evidenced by the various initiatives previously undertaken by the ISHP and its member societies.5
Recent notable activities in the field include the efforts of the American Institute of the History of Pharmacy (AIHP) and the French, Serbian, and Spanish Societies for the History of Pharmacy. These organizations have successfully curated physical and virtual exhibitions, displaying a wide array of historical pharmacy materials. The exhibits feature pharmacopoeias, pharmaceutical ephemera like old prescriptions, historical images, various pharmaceutical objects and instruments, medicinal herbs, and in some cases items associated with renowned pharmacists. A particularly noteworthy project is the AIHP’s Black Lives Matter–themed initiative, representing a unique and commendable approach in this domain.
Similarly, the preservation of historical pharmacy artifacts, documents, and photographs has been skillfully managed by the AIHP and the Danish, French, German, and Hungarian societies. The French society has been active in organizing guided tours to historically significant sites and field trips in France and abroad. Furthermore, the AIHP, along with the British and German societies, have effectively conducted educational workshops, lecture series, and seminars, all led by experts in the field.
In addition, numerous ISHP societies, including those in Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Romania, Switzerland, and Turkey, have proficiently organized traditional national conferences or symposia on pharmacy history. Some of these events have led to the publication of proceedings, further contributing to the field’s body of knowledge.
Looking ahead, the primary goal should be to increase the number and scholarly depth of such endeavors. Subsequently, pursuing the development of joint events between societies, especially in specific geographical regions, is recommended.
In recognition of the ISHP’s founding on August 18, 1926, we propose the establishment of the International Day for Pharmacy History to be observed annually on this date. This commemorative day would serve to honor the rich legacy and worldwide evolution of pharmacy history. It would also be an occasion to pay tribute to eminent pharmacy historians. This includes notable figures such as Hermann Schelenz (1848–1922), Edward Kremers (1865–1941), George Urdang (1882–1960), Eugène‐Humbert Guitard (1884–1976), Glenn Sonnedecker (1917–2021), Rudolf Schmitz (1918–1992), Turhan Baytop (1920–2002), and many others who have made significant contributions. The establishment of this day would celebrate their achievements and inspire continuing research and interest in the history of pharmacy.
Footnotes
↵1. A. Adlung and G. Urdang, Grundriß der Geschichte der deutschen Pharmazie (Berlin: Springer, 1935).
↵2. G. E. Dann, Vierzig Jahre: Internationale Gesellschaft für Geschichte der Pharmazie (Stuttgart: Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft, 1966).
↵3. D. M. Baker, J. L. Colaizzi, K. Leite, R. A. Buerki, G. J. Higby, R. L. McCarthy, and C. Ridgway, “The Teaching of History of Pharmacy in U.S. Pharmacy Schools,” American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 83, no. 1 (2019): 6500.
↵4. H. Tekiner, “Pharmacy History Courses May—And Should—Offer More than Professionalism,” American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 82, no. 4 (2018): 7012.
↵5. “National News for International Use,” ISHP Newsletter 24 (2023): 18–81.